Published 30.03.2022
Keywords
- Cultural Quotient,
- Organizational Quotient,
- Quotient
- Kültürel Zekâ,
- Örgütsel Zekâ,
- Zekâ
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Yavuz Sezer Oğuzhan- Ayşe Nihan Arıbaş (Yazar)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract
In 1920, together with Thorndike, he argued that it wouldn’t be correct to explain intelligence only cognitively and that different factors could be explained by different types of intelligence. The understanding of intelligence began diversifing with social intelligence, thanks to Thorndike, the discovery of man reached different dimensions. One type of intelligence in question is cultural intelligence and organizational intelligence. The ability to adopt different cultures and manage both oneself and the individual and society is explained by the high level of cultural intelligence. Organizations wanting gain competitive power in the globalizing world also develop their own policies and create a perception of organizational common intelligence. In this study, it’s aimed revealing the relationship between the use of cultural intelligence of employees serving and organizational intelligence in their organizations. In addition, the fact that no study has been found in the literature on these two issues makes the study important.
References
- Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., & Keskin, H. (2007). Organizational intelligence: a structuration view. Journal of Organizational Change Management, s.272-290.
- Albrecht, K. (2002). Organizational intelligence & knowledge management: Thinking outside the silos. Executive White Paper, s.1-17.
- Albrecht, K. (2003). The power of minds at work: Organizational intelligence in action. Amacom.
- Alexandra, V., Ehrhart, K. H., & Randel, A. E. (2021). Cultural intelligence, perceived inclusion, and cultural diversity in workgroups. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110285.
- Alkaya, A., & Hepaktan, C. E. (2003). Organizational change. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (1), s.31-58.
- Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: ıts measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and organization review, 3(3), s.335-371.
- Ang, S., Rockstuhl, T., & Tan, M. L. (2015). Cultural intelligence and competencies. International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, 2, s.433-439.
- Azevedo, A. (2018). Cultural intelligence: key benefits to individuals, teams and organizations. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 10 (1), s.52-56.
- Atasever, M., & Işık, H (2018). Stratejik yönetimde misyon ve vizyon ifadelerinin önemi: Türkiye ve Japonya karşılaştırması. İksad Yayınevi.
- Brancu, L., Munteanu, V., & Golet, I. (2016). Understanding cultural intelligence factors among business students in Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, s.336-341.
- Crowne, K. A. (2008). What leads to cultural intelligence?. Business Horizons, 51(5), s.391-399.
- Çalık, T. (2003). İş görenlerin örgüte uyumu (örgütsel sosyalizasyon). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2).
- Doğan, S., & Uysal, Ş. K. (2020). Kültürel zekâ: tanımsal, yapısal ve ilişkisel bir inceleme çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(1), s.147-169.
- Dyne, V. L., Ang, S., & Livermore, D. (2010). Cultural intelligence: A pathway for leading in a rapidly globalizing world. Leading Across Differences, 4(2), s.131-138.
- Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 2(4).
- Harunavamwe, M., & Palmer, V. (2020). Exploring cultural intelligence in the south african working context. Journal For New Generation Sciences, 18(2), s.16-29.
- İbicioğlu, H., & Avcı, U. (2005). Örgütsel öğrenmede paylaşılmış vizyon ve paradigmatik uyumun önemi. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (14), s.157-166.
- Jonyo, B., & Ouma, C. (2018). The effect of mission and vision on organizational performancе within private universities in Kenya. European Journal Of Education Science, 5(2), s.15-33.
- Kalkan, V. D. (2008). Örgütsel zekânın yenilik yeteneğine ve firma performansına etkileri. Doktora Tezi, Gebze Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Karimi, O., & Eshaghi, R. (2018). The impact of cultural intelligence on competitive intelligence. Multilingual Academic Journal Of Education and Social Sciences, 6(1), s.199-213.
- Kheirabadi, M. A., Rahimi, G., a Zamani, A., Alizadeh, F., Basiri, Z., & Oveisi, K. (2019). The comparison between the attitudes of employees and clients towards organizational intelligence (case study: Isfahan General Directorate of Sports and Youth). Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertension, 14(1), s.63-69.
- Leung, K., Ang, S., & Tan, M. L. (2014). Intercultural competence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), s.489-519.
- Livermore, D., & Soon, A. N. G. (2015). Leading with cultural intelligence: The real secret to success. Amacom.
- Mangi, A. A., Kanasro, H. A., Burdi, M. B., & Rehman, F. N. (2015). Team work: A key to organizational success. The Government-Annual Research Journal of Political Science., 3(03), s.87-95.
- Neyişci, N., & Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2020). Sosyal ağ etkileşiminin örgütsel zeka düzeyine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(2), s.354-374.
- Nosratabadi, S., Bahrami, P., Palouzian, K., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Leader cultural intelligence and organizational performance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), s.1809310.
- Oğuzhan, Y. S. (2021). Sosyal zeka ile yaşam tatmini arasındaki ilişkide kişilik özelliklerinin düzenleyici rolü üzerine bir araştırma. International Journal of Management and Administration, 5(9), s.164-175.
- Öneren, Ö. Ü. M., & Akyüz, Ö. G. N. E. (2018). Örgütsel zekâ ve örgütsel hafıza arasındaki ilişki. In International Congress Of Business, Economics and Marketing, s.150.
- Rautakivi, T. (2014). Organizational Intelligence, Efficacy and Adaptability in Changing Environments. Public Administration In The Time Of Regional Change (ICPM 2013), s.1-7.
- Sadiku, M. N., Alam, S., & Musa, S. M. (2019). Social intelligence: A primer. International Journal Of Research-Granthaalayah, 7(9), s.213-217.
- Stalinski, S. (2004). Organizational intelligence: A systems perspective. Organization Development Journal, 22(2), s.55-67.
- Taşdemir, D. D. (2020). Çok kültürlü çalışma ortamında kültürel zeka ve duygusal emek- (Ed). Hülya Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu. Efe Akademi Yayınları.
- Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), s.1-10.
- Thomas, D. C., Elron, E., Stahl, G., Ekelund, B. Z., Ravlin, E. C., Cerdin, J. L., & Lazarova, M. B. (2008). Cultural intelligence: Domain and assessment. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(2), s.123-143.
- Thorndike, E.L. (1920). Intelligence and its use. Harpers Magazine, 140, s.227-235.
- Tunç, B. (2013). Örgütsel bilgi yönetimi. Yönetimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar. (Ed. H. Basri Memduhoğlu & Kürşad Yılmaz). Geliştirilmiş 2. Baskı. Pegem Akademi. s.73-95.
- Turan, S. (2017). Okul yöneticilerinin kuantum liderlik davranışlarının örgütsel zekâ düzeyine etkisi (Zonguldak ili örneği). Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
- Wawrosz, P., & Jurásek, M. (2021). Developing ıntercultural efficiency: The relationship between cultural ıntelligence and self-efficacy. Social sciences, 10(8), s.312.
- Yıldırım, E. (2006). Örgütsel öğrenmenin öncülü olarak örgütsel zeka: Teori ve bir uygulama. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(20), s.145-170.
